Law applicable to a surety-bond loan: the provisions of the Civil Code and the Consumption Code do not constitute mandatory rules
Civil Law / Commercial Law
Source: Supreme Court, 1st Civil Ch. 16th Sept 2015, n°14-10.373 JurisData n° 2015-020553
On April 19th 2006, an Italian bank granted a loan to a private individual, who usually lives in Italy. Another private individual, who usually lives in France, acted as a guarantor for this loan, by separate document dated April 21st 2006, also concluded in Italy. After having pronounced the acceleration, the bank issued a writ against the borrower and the guarantor for the payment of all due sums.
The Court of Appeal of Besançon declared the French Law applicable to the contract of guarantee, in accordance with the provisions of the article 4 of the Rome Convention dated June 19th 1980 related to the Law applicable to contractual obligations, under which the contract is governed by the law of the country with which it has the closest links. In order to declare the French Law applicable to the guarantee contract, the judgement notes that the guarantee is a separate contract and that it was with France that the disputed contract had the closest links.
The Supreme Court partially reversed the appeal decision in accordance with this text.
In absence of a choice by the parties, the contract is governed by the law of the country with which it has the closest links. Is assumed to have such links, the one where the party who must provide the characteristic performance has, at the time of the contract conclusion, his usual residence.
This presumption is left aside when it results from all the circumstances that the contract presents closer links with another country.
In this particular case, the Supreme Court notes that the disputed guarantee contract, written in Italian, had been concluded in Italy, that the lender had its head office in that country, that the borrower had there his usual residence and that the surety-bond contract, whose surety-bond act constituted the guarantee, was governed by the Italian Law, from which it resulted that the disputed surety-bond contract had closer links with Italy than France.
Then, in order to declare the French Law applicable to the surety-bond contract, the appeal decision notes as well that the texts of the French Law related to the protection of the guarantor and to the formalism of his commitment have a mandatory nature.
The Supreme Court also partially reversed the appeal decision in application of the article 3 of the Civil Code, together with the article 1326 of the same code, the articles L341-2 and L341-3 of the Consumption Code and the article 7, paragraph 2 of the Rome Convention dated June 19th 1980:
«[…]neither the article 1326 of the Civil Code, which gives obligation to the party that commits on its own towards another one, to pay him a sum of money, to add on the act that ascertains this commitment, his signature as well as a mention, written by himself, of the sum in both letters and figures, nor the articles L341-2 and L341-3 of the Consumption Code, which enforce the private individual who acts as guarantor towards a professional debtor, to have his signature preceded by a written mention, the mentions provided by these texts being intended to unsure a better protection of the guarantor, are laws, which have to be observed for the protection of the political, social and economical organisation of the country to the extent of imperatively govern the situation, whatever the law applicable is, and to constitute a mandatory rule.»
Historique
-
Law applicable to a surety-bond loan: the provisions of the Civil Code and the Consumption Code do not constitute mandatory rules
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreCivil Law / Commercial Law Source: Supreme Court, 1st Civil Ch. 16th Sept...
-
A cheque not dated given as a guarantee of a loan of money is valid
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreCivil Law Source: Supreme Court, Commercial Ch., 22nd Sept 2015, n°14-17.9...
-
Action of the creditor against the offending third party seized, in the absence of a declaration of debt at the collective proceeding of the debtor
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreCollective proceedings Source: Supreme Court, Commercial Ch., 8 Sept 2015,...
-
The employer cannot lay off an employee who was protected, for a motive already rejected by the work inspection
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreLabour Law Source: Supreme Court, Social Ch., 23 Sept 2015, n°14-10.648...
-
The travelling times domicile-first client and last client-domicile of itinerant employees must be considered as an effective working time
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreLabour Law Source: European Court of Justice, 10 Sept 2015, n° C-266/14...
-
Adoption by the Senate of the Project of Law for the modernisation of the French Health System (consecration of the right to oblivion)
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreThe Senate has adopted on October 6th 2015 a Project of Law establishing the...
-
L’absence de datation d’un chèque remis en garantie d’un prêt d’argent est valable
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreDroit civil Source : Cass. com., 22 sept. 2015, n° 14-17.901 JurisData n°...
-
Action du créancier contre le tiers saisi fautif en l’absence de déclaration de créance à la procédure collective du débiteur
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreProcédures collectives Source : Cass. com., 8 sept. 2015, n° 14-15.831...
-
L’employeur ne peut licencier un salarié qui était protégé pour un motif déjà rejeté par l’inspection du Travail
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreDroit du travail Source :Cour de Cassation ch. Soc.23 septembre 2015 Pourv...
-
Le temps de trajet domicile-premier client et dernier client-domicile des salariés itinérants doit être considéré comme du temps effectif de travail
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreDroit du travail Source : Arrêt de la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenn...
-
Adoption par le Sénat du Projet de loi pour la modernisation du système de santé français (consécration du droit à l’oubli)
Publié le : 22/10/2015 22 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreDroit des Assurances Le Senat a adopté le 6 janvier 2015 un projet de loi...
-
Loi applicable au cautionnement d’un prêt : les dispositions du Code Civil et du Code la Consommation ne constituent pas des lois de police
Publié le : 21/10/2015 21 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreDroit civil/ Droit commercial Source: Cass. 1re civ., 16 sept. 2015, n° 14...
-
L'obligation d'organiser une visite médicale de reprise incombe à l'employeur
Publié le : 01/10/2015 01 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreSource: Cass. soc. 15 octobre 2014, n° 13-14969 Il s'agissait d'un salarié...
-
L'obligation d'organiser une visite médicale de reprise incombe à l'employeur
Publié le : 01/10/2015 01 octobre oct. 10 201520152015 / OctobreSource: Cass. soc. 15 octobre 2014, n° 13-14969 Il s'agissait d'un salarié...
-
Acte de vente : Attention aux diagnostics
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtDroit Immobilier Source: Cass. ch. mixte, 8 juill. 2015, n° 13-26.686 Dan...
-
TABAGISME PASSIF DANS L’ENTREPRISE : L’employeur est responsable
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtDroit du travail Source : Cass. Soc. 3 juin 2015, n°14-11324 En l’espèce...
-
Contrat de travail et loi applicable
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtSource : Cass. soc., 9 juill. 2015, n° 14-13.497 Droit du Travail/ Droit int...
-
Le délai de réflexion dans le mandat de vente
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtDroit Immobilier Source :Cass. 1re civ., 1er juill. 2015, n° 14-15.753 Au...
-
Le délai de réflexion dans le mandat de vente
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtDroit Immobilier Source :Cass. 1re civ., 1er juill. 2015, n° 14-15.753 Au...
-
Deed of sale: Pay attention to the diagnosis
Publié le : 18/08/2015 18 août août 08 201520152015 / AoûtReal Estate Law Source: Supreme Court - ch. mixte, 8 July 2015, n° 13-26.686...